... and the pathetic party.
Left I has a nice (and thoroughly depressing) summary of where the opposition party stands on the issue of attacking still another sovereign country (and one that—shock of all shocks—happens to be sitting on an ocean of oil) on the basis of bullshit accusations: they're all for it.
Wesley Clark, that gentle bomber of Belgrade, sez we can do this with fourteen days of bombing and at a poll at putatitely progressive Daily Kos "has 24% voting for 'force' to 'take out' Iran's nuclear facilities, and another 21% for sanctions."
Basically, a significant (and significantly plugged in) faction of the Democrats is indicating it will back another war of aggression on Iran.
Tuesday, February 07, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(117)
-
▼
February
(17)
- Pouring a pint of blood on the memory of Gandhi
- On animal ID and food safety laws
- Heh...
- Disastrous consequences of cheap food
- "Of course there was drinking. Lots of it."
- Two sides to the NPT
- What's more dangerous, a chicken or a gun?
- Just a flesh wound...
- Who thinks they DON'T have a plan?
- Sedition—yes, sedition
- Calling Chevy Chase
- Dick: How will they spin an 18-HOUR gap?
- Cheney = toast ?
- We have the evil party...
- Time to rename the Department of Defense
- "Shut up or I wll kill you"
- State of the Union
-
▼
February
(17)
1 comment:
You're right. Let's ignore the gathering threat. After all Iran has proven to be so above board in all it's dealings. Invading them is not the answer, but ignoring them is nothing short of delusional desire for Utopia. Have a good day and some more granola.
Post a Comment